- Allows:warrantless action in emergency.
- Examples:danger, escape, evidence loss.
- Test:genuine, proportional.
- Challenge:no true exigency.
Police can sometimes search or enter without a warrant when an emergency makes getting one impractical — but the emergency has to be real, and police cannot manufacture it themselves. The exigent circumstances exception covers situations like imminent danger, hot pursuit, or the imminent destruction of evidence. Because warrantless searches are presumptively unreasonable, the State carries the burden of proving a genuine exigency. Here's how it works.
The Warrant Requirement and Its Emergency Exception
Searches and entries without a warrant are presumptively unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment and the Minnesota Constitution. Exigent circumstances are a recognized exception: when there is a true emergency and no time to get a warrant, police may act. But the exception is narrow, and the State must justify it.
What this means for you: The default is that police need a warrant. Exigency is the State's burden to prove — not something the defense has to disprove.
Recognized Categories of Exigency
Courts generally recognize exigent circumstances in situations such as:
- Imminent danger to life or safety — an emergency aid or "community caretaker" situation, or risk of harm to officers or others;
- Hot pursuit of a fleeing suspect;
- Imminent destruction of evidence — a genuine, immediate risk that evidence will be destroyed before a warrant can be obtained;
- Imminent escape of a suspect.
What this means for you: The category matters. Each has its own requirements, and a claimed exigency that doesn't genuinely fit one of these is vulnerable.
Police Cannot Create the Exigency
A crucial limit: police generally cannot rely on an exigency they created themselves through their own conduct (for example, by announcing their presence in a way designed to provoke the destruction of evidence). If officers manufactured the emergency, they usually can't use it to justify a warrantless entry.
The Home Gets the Strongest Protection
Warrantless entry into a home is subject to especially close scrutiny. The home is at the core of Fourth Amendment protection, so claimed exigencies justifying entry into a residence are examined carefully. Minnesota courts are particularly cautious about warrantless home entries.
What this means for you: A warrantless entry into your home on an exigency theory is a strong candidate for a suppression challenge.
Scope and Duration Limits
Even a valid exigency only justifies what the emergency requires. Once the exigency passes, the justification ends — police generally must then get a warrant to continue. A search that outlasts or exceeds the emergency can become unlawful.
Updated May 18, 2026 · Law verified as of June 17, 2026. This article is general information about Minnesota law, not legal advice.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can police enter without a warrant in an emergency?
Sometimes. Exigent circumstances — like imminent danger, hot pursuit, or imminent destruction of evidence — can justify a warrantless entry or search, but the State must prove a genuine emergency.
Who has to prove the emergency was real?
The State. Warrantless searches are presumptively unreasonable, so the prosecution bears the burden of establishing a valid exigency.
Can police create their own emergency to justify entry?
Generally no. If officers manufactured the exigency through their own conduct, they usually cannot rely on it to justify a warrantless search.
Is a home treated differently?
Yes. Warrantless entry into a home receives especially close scrutiny because the home is at the core of constitutional protection.
What happens after the emergency ends?
The justification ends with the exigency. Continuing to search after the emergency passes generally requires a warrant, and exceeding the emergency's scope can make the search unlawful.
Related guides
Can the Police Stop You in Minnesota? Investigative Stops Explained
Police can stop and detain you only on "reasonable suspicion." Learn what that means, whether you must give your name, frisks, and how long a stop can...
Read the guideConsent Searches in Minnesota: Can You Say No to Police?
Police can search without a warrant if you consent — but consent must be voluntary, and you can refuse. Learn your rights, scope limits, and co-tenant...
Read the guideRacial Profiling and Unlawful Police Stops in Minnesota
In Minnesota, race or national origin alone can never justify a police stop. Learn what racial profiling is, your rights, and how to challenge an unla...
Read the guideThe information on this article is for general informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Reading this article does not create an attorney-client relationship.